2010 La Mer Chardonnay

It had been some time since my last review, this is not to say that I haven’t been drinking wine because I have. A good amount of it too!! In truth I have been working on two wine certifications, and the studying, both books and tastings, became all consuming for a while. But hopefully I’ll soon have some credentials to add to my reviews instead of just being your average wino. So I wanted to return with a great bottle to review, or what I hoped would be a great bottle. So I chose the La Mer Reserve Chard 2010 from the Santa Lucia Highlands.
It was on a trip to Napa about three years ago that Charlie Smith of Smith and Madrone Vineyards (one of the most amazing views of the valley you’ll ever see is on their property btw) told me that the next big thing from California would be Burgundy style wines from the Santa Lucia Highlands. Truth be told, that AVA has been around since 1990 but only recently has been getting the acclaim it deserves and only after my visit to Smith and Madrone to I begin to pay attention to the area. It has rolling hills and many of the vines are planted high (Up to 1200 feet) and combined with it’s proximity to the Monterrey Bay which provides cool breezes, fog and helps to moderate the climate in general, its the perfect spot for Chardonnay and Pinot Noir. A North American Burgundy. So I’ve come to really appreciate and like the wines made here, both Chard and Pinot, and was excited to try the La Mer.
What I got when I opened the 2010 Reserve was a bit of a surprise however. It was a clear, pale lemon color in the glass and had slow forming legs. But the surprise started with the nose and continued on the palette. The first things that jumped out on the nose were malolactic and oak, which is atypical for most wines from the SLH and any that seek to emulate a Burgundian style. The nose was big, and I got a lot of creamy, buttery scents that are indicative of malolactic fermentation and vanilla and cooking spices from its time in oak barrels. I had to seek fruit scents, but could get some citrus, like lemon, and tangerine. But the oaky / ML scents absolutely dominated. On the palette, this bottle is a ML BOMB. Cream and buttered popcorn were the first and most lingering flavors and much like the nose, I had to really search for some fruit. I got that tangerine and citrus but also a little tart green apple as well. It was dry, with a light body but the dominant characteristics were high acidity and high alcohol. The acidity was through the roof, border-lining on unbalancing the wine. And there was a definite alcohol burn, it’s a 14.1% ABV wine which is pretty high, especially for a white. Bottom line, this wine is not Burgundian in style. Quite the opposite in fact. It is very much a California Chard, and the style would have fooled me into thinking it was from Napa if I wasn’t looking at the bottle. It spent 10 months in new French oak and has sur lie aging and those two things dominate the smells and flavors of this bottle. It has a nice long finish, but the finish is oak and ML, not fruity.
There were less than 900 cases of this wine made, and its worth picking one up if you can find it IF you like the typical California style of chard; big, oaky and creamy. Don’t pick it up if you’re looking for a Burgundy clone or a lighter, fruitier style of Chard that is much more common in the SLH region. It’s good, not great, and I had trouble getting over the acid, ML and alcohol. I think Id pair this a rich dish or a heavy white fish. It could probably also stand up to red sauce or big protein because of the acidity. It retails for $55, but I thankfully got it for $20 on winestilsoldout.com. If you can find it at that $20 price point, go for it. Again, but only if you like this style of chardonnay.




